|
|
Does a Written History of the Olmecs and Mayans of
Archaeology
is a science that attempts to reconstruct history, where no written or oral
history exists. It involves
systematic recovery and examination of material evidence, such as graves,
buildings, tools, and pottery, remaining from past human life and culture.
It is a painstaking process of digging in the earth for buried artifacts
in hopes of finding evidence of a previous civilization, and of finding articles
or relics that might give some clues about the people who left them.
Using the scientific method, archaeologists postulate a theory for the
origin of their findings, and test this theory, based on all a priori accepted
findings to see if the theory fits the hypothesis for the culture being studied.
When new evidence is unearthed, the theory may need to be modified to fit
with the new findings. It is not an
exact science, however, since a great deal of
interpretation and opinion is required in order to come to conclusions
about the meaning of the artifacts and their relationship to the area, time
period, and application of the civilization which created them.
Anthropology
is the scientific study of the origin, and the physical, social, and cultural
development and behavior of humans. Since
all recorded human history has included some form of religious beliefs of the
cultures being documented, anthropology and archaeology must consider the
religious beliefs of the cultures being investigated, and indeed, such
scientific study would be incomplete without considering the religious beliefs
of these cultures.
But
could a religious history, if it existed, be of benefit to the scientific method
of investigation? Most certainly,
since archaeological investigation is often an ineffective substitute where no
written or oral history exists. If
such a history exists, however, archaeological investigation may serve to
corroborate the religious history, lending credence, where some skeptics may
doubt the authenticity of the religious history.
Such is the case with the Book of Mormon.
The Book of Mormon, published by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day
Saints, purports to be a religious history of the ancient inhabitants of
The
Book of Mormon describes three different migrations to Central America that
correspond remarkably with three civilizations in Central America documented by
Archaeologists: The Olmecs , or
Tolteca’s who lived from 2500 BC to 600 BC, the Mayas, who lived from 600 BC
to 1519 AD, and the Zapotecs, who lived from 500 BC to 200 BC.
The Book of Mormon, published by Joseph Smith in 1830, long before
archaeological discoveries in Central America were available for publication,
tells of great highways and aqueducts, fortified cities, cities buried under
lakes and oceans by earthquakes and volcanoes, and of the building of ancient
temples. The Book of Mormon covers
the Mayan history from 600 BC to 400 AD, and tells of the final destruction of
the Nehites and Lamanites, (descendants of Lehi) in 400 AD.
Archaeologists are puzzled about the origin
of the ancient Mayas, Olmecs or Tultecas, and the Zapotecs.
Archaeologists
spend lifetimes digging in the dirt to find artifacts they hope will help them
piece together a possible history of an ancient civilization.
They are thrilled at the discovery of ancient writings or paintings which
add greater insights than artifacts. If
a history of the inhabitants of ancient
The
stumbling block, which prevents men and women of science from examining the
contents of the Book of Mormon for clues to these ancient civilizations, is the
method in which the Book of Mormon came into existence.
Joseph Smith, a young farm boy living in up-state
Non-believers
often stop their study of the Book of Mormon after hearing of this miraculous
story. However, the old adage,
“You can not judge a book by its cover,” could not be more profound when
applied to the Book of Mormon, whose cover includes the title, and the phrase,
“Another Testament of Jesus Christ.” Between
the covers of the Book of Mormon, in addition to the religious history of the
ancient inhabitants of
Evidences
of the authenticity of the Book of Mormon as a history of the ancient
inhabitants of Central America include 1) Dates and Languages 2) Archaeological,
3) Documentary or traditional histories, and 4) Geographical, as detailed in the
book, Exploring the Lands of the Book of Mormon, by Dr. Joseph L. Allen,
Ph.D.
Although there is no proof that the Book of Mormon is an authentic history of these people, the collection of evidence is overwhelming. While many critics cite a lack of archaeological evidence for certain passages of the Book of Mormon, the lack of evidence is often overcome by additional exploration which eventually reveals the evidence long hidden by time and earth. For a wealth of evidence of the Book of Mormon go to http://www.jefflindsay.com/BMEvidences.shtml